eXTReMe Tracker

Canadiana Isn't Pictures of Naked Hockey Players

Hate Mail to: Cornmotherne at yahoo dot com

Blogroll


March 30, 2007

Fear-Mongering | # | Utter Rubbish — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 8:54 pm

No self-respecting teenager would be caught dead drinking one of THESE. Furthermore, teens know that a cheap bottle of vodka, gin or bourbon will run them around eight bucks (provided they don’t simply raid the parents liqour cabinet)-they can find their own tiny little flasks to tote it about.

 

But hey, what a great justification for police to conduct searches of teens-you know, they might have had a teeny-tiny-bottle of 12% alcohol on them (which in that small of an amount would be what…as potent as vanilla extract?).

 

But be afraid anyway! Fear! Fear! Teenagers! Oh God…what if they consume a couple ounces of weak alcohol and…oh God no…surf the Internet! Someone get those kids into rehab straightaway before their lives are ruined by the cloying menace of brightly coloured alcohol.

 

 

 

Friday Cakeblogging | # | Is There Cake? — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 6:30 pm

This week’s offering is a cherry cake with kirsch flavouring. It is egg, buter and milk free.

Hope everyone has a lovely weekend.

March 29, 2007

“Wilmaaaaaa” | # | Ask the Anthropologist — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 3:21 am

I’ll tell you what-I’m willing to make a deal. If  psychology ghouls keep the hell away from Anthropology I promise never to engage in making psychiatric diagnoses. Deal? I hope so, because reading articles like THIS one really make me cringe. Here’s a taste of the profound insights into human origins being offered-up at Newsweek:

 

“This makes sense from an evolutionary point of view. Think of it this way. You’re out there on the African savannah, trying to scratch out a living, and something bad happens to you. Use your imagination: the hominid equivalent of getting canned or divorced. You’re still fairly primitive emotionally, so you’re naturally upset and instinctively want to focus all your attention on your troubles. But if you mope around, preoccupied with your anger and remorse, you’re not going to notice that saber-toothed tiger crouching nearby. And the longer you stay miserable, the riskier your day-to-day existence becomes. Survival back in those days depended on being highly tuned in to even slight changes in the world. Our ancestors simply couldn’t afford to indulge their hurt feelings.”

 

Interesting how the author feels comfortable describing “hominids” (he does not specify which hominids-maybe the Afarensis were more emotionally developed than Homo Erectus. I mean, I don’t know that-no one does, except for, apparently, the author who states it as though it were a demonstrable fact. As for the image of the hunter “out there on the African savannah…please. Don’t. Really.  

 

“God, that Mr. Slate is such a fucking bastard! Screw it, I’m going bowling.”

 

Really, if you can stomach it, read the entire article. Look, unlike psychology, anthropology is an actual science-you know, demonstrable evidence, reproducible results-that sort of thing.

March 28, 2007

Britain Goes Philip K. Dick On The Poor | # | Fake Science — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 12:52 am

I wish I could say that I’m shocked by the British government plan to screen children for “criminality”, but I’m not. We have similar programmes in place in the US, though they are at the state level and vary considerably from one place to another. In the US it would still be considered too politically incorrect to blatantly lump poverty with criminality, so instead we hear the term “at risk.”

 

“The Government believes children can be prevented from becoming offenders if early intervention is targeted at those who displayed certain behaviours. These include having a short attention span or behaving aggressively or living in a difficult or deprived environment.” (emphasis mine).

 

Oh, I’ll just bet they believe a “deprived environment” leads to criminal behaviour. Given that there has been a recent scandal in Britain where children from poor families have been quickly adopted out without suitable time for the birth parents to appeal the decision (leading to charges that the poor are having their children seized and given to wealthy families that wish to adopt) it is not difficult to believe that the government would argue that by removing children from poor households they are in effect, preventing crime. Again, this sort of thing happens frequently in the US, but much less blatantly. I can’t help but think of the children that were taken from leftist families in Argentina during the Dirty War and given to government supporters that would bring them up with an ideology that was more acceptable to the ruling party (after torturing and killing the children’s parents). Think that’s an unfair association? All we’re talking about is degrees here. Sending a mother to prison for a decade on minor drug possession charges and adopting her child out to “approved” parents? How many of these “abuse/neglect” allegations are based on the family’s economic position? You don’t want to believe it, and until I began researching it for a piece I’m working on-I wouldn’t have believed it either. In the US there is a push to shorten the time children spend in foster care (to save money, of course) by dissolving parental rights quickly. This has been hailed as an advancement, though obviously not by the people that have had their children seized from them for the crime of being poor and unable to hire skilled legal representation. “At risk” is code for poverty.

 

The British example is interesting in that they are not trying to establish that any actual abuse has taken place, but rather that the child will, at some point in the future, turn criminal. It is pre-emptive intervention. Curiously, there’s no mention of what this idea of predicting criminality is based on. It seems that were the British so terribly concerned over preventing the poor from turning criminal, that all this government intervention might be put to better use strengthening social programmes. Yeah, I know-Thatcher killed that idea two decades ago. It’s so much easier to cart off the children and send the parents to prison for “crimes” that would have been misdemeanours but a generation ago.

 

 

March 27, 2007

Daycare Study | # | Utter Rubbish — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 8:11 pm

When the story about daycare leading to behaviour problems in children was initially reported, the major outlets covered it in such a way that it sounded as though the findings were conclusive. As it turns out, they are not. According to the study, the findings are of quite subtle differences and have a good deal to do with quality of daycare and parenting.

 

What would have been more interesting than blaming working mothers for placing their children in daycare (because really, that’s what these type of hysterical headlines are designed to do, give the would-be-finger-pointers fodder) would be an article or two discussing why quality daycare is inaccessible to so many. Instead of blaming the poor for being unable to afford to stay home with their children or send them to centres that instruct youngsters on the proper way to serve tea and a foreign language or two, the articles might have taken a look at just how unequal the situation is.

 

So all you parents with children in daycare-relax. Your kid’s behaviour problems are most likely minimal. Don’t worry; they’ll have twelve years of American public school education to develop genuine behaviour problems, compounded by an inability to think.  

 
 

Gross Out Alert | # | Dannypants — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 12:35 am

We have a king sized, heavy mahogany sleigh bed in our bedroom. It is a bit large for the room; so we have the headboard pretty much flush against the wall, save for about two inches. Two inches is apparently enough for a toddler to lean his head over and begin vomiting a stream of egg salad and green beans down the headboard and wall. Then, just because-oh I dunno, because it’s Monday, he turned around (still puking) and decided to dump the rest of his dinner on my pillows and quilt. Funny how this kid never manages to puke in his own bed. It’s a good thing we love him. Did I mention he’s still breaking out in new hives?

 

 


His pop is bathing him now-we’ll pull the bed out and scrape eggy vomit off the wall later.

 

 


*Bonus Gross-Out

There is a trail of rubbery cubes of regurgitated egg white from my bedroom to the bathroom. One of the best things motherhood has given me is the ability to calmly walk the hallway picking up cubes of puke with my bare hands. Not that I expect to put that skill to use outside of the home-still, one never knows.

March 24, 2007

Assorted Links | # | Uncategorized — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 4:11 am

Things I didn’t find time to write about but I found interesting nonetheless.

Household drudgery prevents cancer.

 

Is your blog banned in China? Find Out HERE.

 

When historians cook.

 

Now they’re serving drug warrants on middle aged people for simple possession. It should be noted that David City is a very small, rural town. Not exactly a place teeming with criminal activity. At least they didn’t send in a SWAT team.

 

And now a third Renault worker has killed himself at a plant in France. From the article it sounds like pretty horrific working conditions.

 

Another day, another database.

 

 And finally,finding the humour in wildlife biology.

 

 

Not This Week | # | Is There Cake? — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 1:28 am

There would have been cake, if my son hadn’t developed a very sudden allergic reaction to penicillin. I pulled the half-baked cake from the oven and made the mad dash (twenty minutes) into Ashland to buy children’s benadryl. The pharmacist was great, giving us a syringe and helping me figure out the right dosage for his weight. It is a small independent pharmacy that does mostly compounding and all I can say is thank God they were open.

 


I’ve never had a bad case of hives, so it came as a complete surprise to me to see how quickly and aggressively they covered Danny’s body. We’re talking minutes. It happened on day nine of ten days of penicillin. Go figure. He’s had the drug twice before, but I guess this was just his time to react to exposure. Poor kid, he looks like something out of a horror movie. By the time I got him to the doctor, he was pretty much bouncing off the walls from the antihistamines (some kids react that way, I’m told) and was all too pleased to lift his t-shirt and show off his belly welts to anyone willing to look. From my son’s perspective, this is just about the coolest thing that’s ever happened to him. He’s been spending a good deal of time admiring them in the full length mirror in my bedroom. At least he’s not uncomfortable or itchy.

 


It took just about everything I possess in the control-your-emotions department to keep from sitting down in the middle of the pharmacy and bawling my eyes out. I don’t tend to freak-out easily, but jeepers those hives look scary. We live so far out in the country (and as I recently found out through a not-so-fun experience with my own chronic illness, it takes a whopping nine minutes for an ambulance to get to our house) that in an emergency situation, every minute counts. I had no way of knowing if the hives would escalate into breathing difficulties or shock. The paediatrician suggested a paediatric eppi pen (I have an adult one due to nut allergies) and I readily agreed. Our insurance (that we keep paying more and more money for as it covers less and less) paid six dollars towards the pen and we picked up the remaining $57.00. I’m sure glad we don’t have socialised medicine in the United States because it would really cut down on the quality of care that we get from our private insurance. Bastards.

 


Danny is doing much better. The hives will take a few days to go away, and at least we know that he can never have penicillin again (subsequent exposures would be even more serious). As both of his parents are allergic to penicillin, it isn’t completely shocking that he had a reaction-I just thought we were clear of it as he’d had it a few times before without any reaction. Ugh. Can’t wait to see if he’s allergic to nuts like I am.

 


As I write this, he’s running laps around the dining room table singing “I’m A Little Teapot.”

 


Poor Dannypants.

March 22, 2007

Exterminator Day | # | Romanticised Pastoral — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 11:31 am

It’s Exterminator Day. No, that isn’t a nod to the works of William S. Burroughs (though our exterminator is a bit on the “Burroughsish” side, though I can’t quite imagine him pulling the William Tell stunt on his wife). Our “Bug Guy” (out here in the country, everyone is a “guy” even the women. You have your Bank Guy, your Insurance Guy, your Seed and Feed Guy, etc.) is coming over this evening to spray the hell out of the house and around the outside foundation. That means everything out of the kitchen cabinets (did that last evening) and then, out of the house for a few hours afterward. He insists the substance he uses is “safe” but come on. I won’t let him spray Danny’s room, and mostly he gets behind the bookcases and places where children and dogs cannot go-just in case. I think he’s largely using boric acid-indoors at least. Whatever he applied last year for the ants worked great and we didn’t see a single trail all season.

 

We began a tradition of going out to the same fast-food joint for dinner on Exterminator Day about five years ago. This is a once-a year outing for us (though last year I was taken out to breakfast on Mother’s Day, so technically that was two meals eaten outside the home last year) and while I cannot claim to actually look forward to it, the break from the kitchen is nice. Unfortunately, the food at Culvers has not been very appetising the last couple of times. Since they are considerably more expensive than other fast-food type restaurants, there’s sort of an expectation of some quality-at least to our minds. So I don’t know. I hate to spend money and eat something I don’t like just to say we went out. I’m thinking that it might make more sense to pack sandwiches and eat in the car. I need to do a few errands which could be accomplished this evening instead of sitting around a fast food place smelling the endlessly re-used grease from the deep fryer. But that’s me.

 

Last year, Danny sat in a highchair quietly eating his dinner as a family at another table chased after their toddler alternately demanding and pleading that the child sit down and eat. On the way out, the dad jokingly said to us;

“Enjoy his behaviour now-in a year you’ll miss it.”

 

A year has passed and I’m pleased to report that Daniel does not run about during meals, nor do we plead, demand or cajole. On the weekend, when I do my grocery shopping, Danny eats a sack lunch from home with his Pop in the dining area of the grocery (thus far no one has complained about us bringing-in Danny’s lunch-we do purchase drinks). This permits me to shop alone (and quickly) and gives Danny the experience of dining in a public place. He has never been permitted to run about or bother other customers in any way. He has, on occasion, been known to play “peek-a-boo” with elderly women at nearby tables, but that’s about it. Now that he can sit without a highchair, he still understands that being at the table means eating-not running about being a nuisance to others.

 

I realise this sounds harsh, and largely, it is intended to be. A crying or whiny child is one thing, and I’m fairly sympathetic on that score. However, by the time a child is a toddler, and old enough to understand that there are acceptable behaviours in particular situations, they need to sit the hell down and eat dinner. It is unfair to other diners, and a major obstacle to servers. Furthermore, it is never appropriate for a child to tear apart sugar packets, pats of butter, or any other condiments on the table. Ever. Mealtime is not playtime. I blame the chain fast-food places that stick playgrounds inside the restaurants. No, I take that back-I blame the parents. I really do. I think my son is adorable, but I also understand that others are not likely to share the feeling. I cannot imagine feeling “entitled” to impose my child’s poor manners on strangers.

 

Now watch, from my mouth to God’s ears, twenty bucks says Daniel decides to be horrible at dinner tonight. I can assure you this much, if he does, we’re leaving. I don’t negotiate with two year olds.

 

 

 

 

England, Your England | # | Police State — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 9:04 am

Rather than have spy cameras in waste bins to catch people who fail to separate their rubbish properly, why not install those cameras used on the street that permit an observer at a remote location to actually shout at the offender?

 


“Hey you there, no mixing glass with the tins. Police have been dispatched, thank you.”

 


A pretty well written take on the British police state may be read HERE.

Today’s Outrage | # | Uncategorized — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 4:08 am

A child falls out of a baby swing because the daycare provider forgot to buckle her in-and the provider is subsequently charged with child abuse.

 

The article indicates that the hospital called the police. I guess I’m just shocked that they filed charges. Even if it is dismissed, this woman’s life is ruined.

When I was in pre-school, I broke my arm when the teacher looked away for a second and did not catch me as I came down the large slide. Was Mrs. Chandelson a child abuser (Anyone that ever heard her sing might be inclined to answer "yes"-talk about abuse)?

As someone noted in the comments-pretty soon no one will be willing to watch children-it is not worth the risk of careless, baseless accusations. There was a case a few months ago (also in Lincoln) where a teacher was charged with child sexual assault because he had a hole in his pants and didn’t realise it and one of the students caught a peek at his man parts.

 

You’d have to be out of your mind to work with children today.

March 21, 2007

Spring Weather | # | Romanticised Pastoral — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 6:07 pm

We’re bracing for a line of severe storms heading through here this afternoon and evening. From Friday through Sunday, it looks like another potentially dangerous system will be moving into the area. Right now, it is in the mid seventies and very, very humid, sauna-like. I knew it was going to be a strange day when I found a frog in the middle of my kitchen floor (yes, I set him loose in the back yard). At the moment, the wind is dead-still and the sky has that funny overcast yellowish look that scares the daylights out of me. One tornado in my lifetime was plenty, thank you very much. Subsequently, every formation I spot looks funnel-ish (what? You want “technical” terms?) or potentially “wall cloud-ish.”  I grew up in the Midwest, and spent enough school time engaged in tornado drills with my head bent to my knees and arms shielding the back of my neck to know what’s required in a dangerous weather situation-but that still doesn’t make it any less frightening. I guess I’ll go open the storm cellar-just in case.

 

In the event that we don’t

A) Lose power

B) Get hit by a tornado

C) Get baseball sized hail

 

I’ll be doing some interesting cooking today and should have updated posts at the cooking blog late this evening or early tomorrow. I’m not holding my breath though. In my experience, these storms seem to hit precisely at the dinner hour. Just as the heat of the day cools rapidly with the coming front, the weather radio begins beeping, and the Soubise that I prepared ahead save for the cream sauce sits congealing on the no-longer-warmed vegetable dish whilst we take cover underground. Don’t bother asking about the glazed turnips and carrots-we all know about the glazed turnips and carrots. Did I mention an apple tart? Oh, there’s apple tart (French style with an applesauce filling). None of that will matter however, as we’ll almost certainly be sitting on the dirt floor of the storm cellar listening for sirens. Have I mentioned how much I dislike this time of year?

 

 

Nebraska Nanny State | # | Utter Rubbish — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 1:38 pm

There’s a bill before the Nebraska Unicameral that will require couples seeking a marriage license to submit to eight hours of marriage counseling, or pay a one hundred dollar fee.

 

 


Aside from the obvious-that eight hours of marriage counseling isn’t likely to do much, there’s the more serious issue of whether the State ought to be in the business of legitimising a questionable practice (i.e. therapy/counseling) by requiring participation. As I’ve stated before, if a consenting adult wishes to seek counseling/therapy, join a cult, or worship the Flying Spaghetti Monster-it’s all fine and well, so long as they keep it the hell away from me.

 

 


Perhaps I’m looking at the issue from the wrong angle in that it would ultimately be better for all parties concerned if the State would just get out of granting marriage status completely. We should all have civil unions. Honestly, when these sorts of bills are offered up in the legislature, they do seem a bit suspect. It is quite a simple matter to hide behind "family values" as code for discrimination. Saying outright that people who take marriage "seriously" will submit to the counseling lays the groundwork for those who see themselves as morally superior to begin defining what is and is not marriage, how one ought to behave, and so forth. Those who object will be required to pay a $100.00 fee for their ideological differences.

 

 


I see a very slippery slope ahead.

March 20, 2007

Funny How This Only Happens To Black Kids | # | Police State — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 12:42 am

A seven year old is cuffed and arrested for sitting on his bike on a city sidewalk in Baltimore. Seriously. A seven year old.

 

I’ll bet those cops felt really, really powerful scaring the shit out of a first grader who was clearly, headed down a path of hardened crime.

Unknown News | # | As Seen From the Armchair — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 12:25 am

I have a commentary up at Unknown News, if anyone feels like reading it. The post is a response to one of those "blame the victims for their own misery" type letters the site often receives.

 

 


It’s so easy to tell people what they ought to do with their lives, when it is someone else’s suffering.

March 16, 2007

Friday Cakeblogging | # | Is There Cake? — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 4:08 pm

Well, I did it. You can also view a couple of magnificent rye breads and a salmon pie that any self-respecting Canadian would laugh at.

 

Hope everyone has a lovely weekend.

Thoughts On Cakeblogging | # | Is There Cake? — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 2:02 am

I might take tomorrow off from cakeblogging as I’m somewhat busy at the moment. We’ll see. The cooking blog has been getting a fair number of search engine hits from people looking for “Lenten cakes” and in some ways I feel obligated to provide some recipes if people are willing to observe old traditions. I sort of think gingerbread would work, if you used applesauce to replace the moisture. The more I thought about it, most vegan cakes are egg and dairy free, though they do tend to go overboard on cocoa powder something many people give up for Lent. There are also many, many old recipes from the Depression era that were designed to save eggs and butter, which could be useful. We’ll see, if there is a cake tomorrow, it will likely be posted late in the day or early evening.

 

 

March 15, 2007

Thanks For Reminding Me | # | Uncategorized — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 2:54 am

-why I had pretty much nothing to say about the Scooter Libby/Plame "outing" nonsense. Counterpunch has a lead story today about the rise of Latin America by none other than Philip Agee.

 

I wonder,  if the people who’ve been screaming the loudest about the "traitors" that outed Plame’s identity would have similar reactions to Mr. Agee’s work? Well of course not silly, he’d be a hero then. You can see why reading all the self-congratulatory articles about "justice being served" are kind of, sort of…idiotic.

British Nanny State | # | Utter Rubbish — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 2:40 am

Oh for crying out loud. I just read some insane thing about children in the US being required to hop on one foot for five steps before being considered ready for school. At least in the US we can blame all this scrutiny and parental anxiety on the "early intervention" industry convincing people there is something defective with their children. What’s the British government’s excuse? Someone, somewhere is making money off of this-mark my words.

 

Read some of the examples-they are horribly vague and subjective. Sure, touch your toes is pretty straightforward, but "contribute to your own well being?" How? Making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich? Brushing their teeth? Positive daily affirmations (oh good lord, they just might require that)?

 

You can be certain (I’m certain) that these criteria will be used selectively against parents in the lower income brackets who already find themselves the targets of these intrusive government schemes. Watch, you’ll see people lose their council flats for having children that do not coo convincingly enough when evaluated by social workers.

 

Literacy At The Paediatrician’s Office | # | Uncategorized — J.S. (not the Watergate felon) Magruder @ 1:35 am

THIS is an interesting programme where a trip to the paediatrician’s office has children coming home with a new book. That’s quite an improvement over ours where we spent over an hour today trapped in the waiting room under the glare of a massive television screen sponsored by the Company of the Mouse flashing god-awful cartoons and advertising loops for corresponding products. Ugh. Not a book to be found, though they did have some rather disgusting magazines that seemed to be on the verge of Vogue for youngsters filled with all manner of high-end clothing and gear. Danny was too sick to care and pretty much sat on my lap slumped against me.

 


After the appointment, they have a box filled with “toys” like free bean-bag toys advertising the latest pharmaceutical (last visit we got “Mr. Mucus” from Mucinex) and small plastic toys that a paediatrician’s office ought to realise pose a hell of a chocking hazard. Danny left with a basketball keychain which of course, I hope he forgets about as it is way too dangerous to be played with unsupervised.

 


It is sort of amazing to me how many people think that a book must be “new” for a child to read it. The place where we typically purchase our books are 5 for a dollar on children’s. Even the Goodwill is only .39 cents per book. I cannot imagine how people claim to be unable to afford books for their children. I mean, come on. Still, if someone isn’t inclined to read to a child, the free book at the office visit might be an incentive, however the fixation people have with new items really eludes me.

 


I do have an amusing anecdote from the visit. The nurse came to give Daniel a bit of Tylenol and some water as he was running a fever (that he didn’t have when we left the house)and after squirting the liquid in his mouth Danny looked at her and said;

“That was good. Thank You.”

 


Poor kid.

 

I’ve had about four hours of sleep in the last three days-does it show?

 

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by Donncha O Caoimh